08-22-2010, 02:20 AM
In essence, yes!
Say if you were to post your new code in reply to this thread. Since the table is already posted in one reply, the CSS is embedded into the thread. So any CSS coding using the class of "layla" will associated the background image with the picture not including her accessories.
However, if you were to change the name of the class to say "layla2" and make sure the image url was changed, then that image is now associated with that class. So you'd be able to respond to that thread and each table would remain different, because they're working off of two separate CSS class codes.
So.. like I was trying to explain before. If you didn't change the class name of your table and went to post it as a reply to that specific thread (where the wrong code is already posted) the CSS would do it's job and change your coding with the new image to the old coding, since that's what came first in the thread.
Hope that explains better! (It's early so my brain doesn't think as clearly.) :3
Say if you were to post your new code in reply to this thread. Since the table is already posted in one reply, the CSS is embedded into the thread. So any CSS coding using the class of "layla" will associated the background image with the picture not including her accessories.
However, if you were to change the name of the class to say "layla2" and make sure the image url was changed, then that image is now associated with that class. So you'd be able to respond to that thread and each table would remain different, because they're working off of two separate CSS class codes.
So.. like I was trying to explain before. If you didn't change the class name of your table and went to post it as a reply to that specific thread (where the wrong code is already posted) the CSS would do it's job and change your coding with the new image to the old coding, since that's what came first in the thread.
Hope that explains better! (It's early so my brain doesn't think as clearly.) :3