08-06-2012, 08:10 AM
I'm too tired to even take this all in right now. v___v Kudos to you guys for helping figure this out and help us with the problem. <3
I do have a question regarding IC threads that were affected by the data loss. I know that a couple of my threads were spreed in or otherwise had a lot of posts made over the days since the backup, and it would be frustrating as all hell to try to recreate those posts. I'm sure others would feel the same way.
Basically, I am asking if it would be against the rules or otherwise not good to utilize "time skips" in those threads. Instead of trying to redo the posts, the next person to reply to the thread would write an ooc "summary" about the posts eaten by the data loss, and they would continue where they would have if the loss hadn't happened.
Would that be allowed? It would come at the cost of post counts, but it would also be less stressful for a lot of us.
I do have a question regarding IC threads that were affected by the data loss. I know that a couple of my threads were spreed in or otherwise had a lot of posts made over the days since the backup, and it would be frustrating as all hell to try to recreate those posts. I'm sure others would feel the same way.
Basically, I am asking if it would be against the rules or otherwise not good to utilize "time skips" in those threads. Instead of trying to redo the posts, the next person to reply to the thread would write an ooc "summary" about the posts eaten by the data loss, and they would continue where they would have if the loss hadn't happened.
Would that be allowed? It would come at the cost of post counts, but it would also be less stressful for a lot of us.